Things new editors must know about Wikipedia

We have come for the particular cause for the individuals who have limited or no experience with Wikipedia writing and editing. The discussion below might not surprise the experienced writer but can help the majority to shape the informed opinion related to how Wikipedia works

 

Wikipedia is not a promotional website

If you are waiting for Wikipedia to be acquired by any of the giant internet stop waiting for it. Wikipedia is not a promotional site run by the foundation called the Wikimedia. The organization is supported by the donations and grant the mission to give access to free knowledge to everyone. 

 

Wikipedia speaks numerous languages

Wikipedia speaks more than 300 words. Among which the most sought are the 100 language edition recently with more than 10000 articles, however, that doesn’t mean Wikipedia is not making efforts for the rest. Articles in every language are mainly initiated and developed independently of their equivalents in other words through a handful of them are direct translations.  

 

Anything can be easily modified on Wikipedia

Any information on Wikipedia can be changed, if the edits are appropriately sourced, it will remain and add to the body of knowledge. If the modifications are not sourced, and if even written by the best Wikipedia page creation service, it can be removed. As a general rule, nothing in the Wikipedia is completely deleted. Wikipedia keeps track of the changes to the content. Hence if something must be restored, it can be quickly done. 

 

The quality of your work is the responsibility of Wikipedia  

Wikipedia has a complete set of guidelines and quality control mechanism. The editors can track the changes as they happen, or come to particular topics of interest, keep track of the users’ record of contribution, flag erroneous articles for reviews and report criticism, discuss the advantages of every article with other users and a lot more. 

The articles found as the best are awarded as the featured ones the status and the erroneous pages are flagged for removal. Wikipedia focuses on the enhancement of particular topic areas. The potentially suitable articles might go in other Media or distribute in the educational institutions. 

 

Building the walls of trust with Wikipedia

It’s quite natural for the crowdsourcing platform and works in progress such as Wikipedia that quality may not remain stable from time and again and may vary from article to article. In the meantime, some article is of the more excellent quality for learning and knowledge well others are undeniable a pile of complete rubbish. Moreover, since anyone can edit Wikipedia at any time, the articles might include errors and criticism that may interpret that Wikipedia is not a reliable source.  Hence it’s highly discouraging to rely on Wikipedia for making important decisions. The encyclopedia is mainly created to enhance the understanding of certain subjects and learn the jargons related to it and learning new aspects for which you can go beyond Wikipedia. The cited links help learn more about the topic. 

 

Wikipedia purely encourages to collect facts

The articles in Wikipedia might not include them, and the contributors are the unpaid volunteers. If you claim to be experienced professor, reveal you're true identity, or prefer to use pseudo names, or make a contribution without registering your edits and arguments judged on the merits. Wikipedia allows the sources that are valid for all the potential claims and don’t permit contributors to make their personal believes points and conclusions publicize while writing articles. All the editors should come up with the neutral point of view they should only collect pertinent opinions that can be drawn to reliable sources.  

 

Wikipedia is a neutral platform and doesn’t encourage the political system

The foundation that runs Wikipedia is ruled by the board of trustees that is needed to its bylaws to have so many members selected from the Wikimedia community. The board and Wikimedia foundation staff may not often take part in the editorial issues, and the projects are self-steered and consensus-driven. Wikipedia is a transparent platform and is self-critic, any controversies are debated openly and even published in Wikipedia when they come to a standard of importance.  

 

Wikipedia has some long term objectives

Wikipedia has been created to live for a hundred years, and if it won’t, it will be transformed into something that is more potential. Hence everything about Wikipedia is crafted towards that extent such as the content, licensing, the organization steering, and general objectives as well as the fundraising scheme.

 

Wikipedia is not a promotional website

If you are waiting for Wikipedia to be acquired by any of the giant internet stop waiting for it. Wikipedia is not a promotional site run by the foundation called the Wikimedia. The organization is supported by the donations and grant the mission to give access to free knowledge to everyone. 

 

Wikipedia speaks numerous languages

Wikipedia speaks more than 300 words. Among which the most sought are the 100 language edition recently with more than 10000 articles, however, that doesn’t mean Wikipedia is not making efforts for the rest. Articles in every language are mainly initiated and developed independently of their equivalents in other words through a handful of them are direct translations.

 

Anything can be easily modified on Wikipedia

Any information on Wikipedia can be changed, if the edits are appropriately sourced, it will remain and add to the body of knowledge. If the modifications are not sourced, and if even written by the best Wikipedia page creation service, it can be removed. As a general rule, nothing in the Wikipedia is completely deleted. Wikipedia keeps track of the changes to the content. Hence if something must be restored, it can be quickly done. 

 

The quality of your work is the responsibility of Wikipedia  

Wikipedia has a complete set of guidelines and quality control mechanism. The editors can track the changes as they happen, or come to particular topics of interest, keep track of the users’ record of contribution, flag erroneous articles for reviews and report criticism, discuss the advantages of every article with other users and a lot more. 

The articles found as the best are awarded as the featured ones the status and the erroneous pages are flagged for removal. Wikipedia focuses on the enhancement of particular topic areas. The potentially suitable articles might go in other Media or distribute in the educational institutions. 

 

Building the walls of trust with Wikipedia

It’s quite natural for the crowdsourcing platform and works in progress such as Wikipedia that quality may not remain stable from time and again and may vary from article to article. In the meantime, some article is of the more excellent quality for learning and knowledge well others are undeniable a pile of complete rubbish. Moreover, since anyone can edit Wikipedia at any time, the articles might include errors and criticism that may interpret that Wikipedia is not a reliable source.  Hence it’s highly discouraging to rely on Wikipedia for making important decisions. The encyclopedia is mainly created to enhance the understanding of certain subjects and learn the jargons related to it and learning new aspects for which you can go beyond Wikipedia. The cited links help learn more about the topic. 

 

Wikipedia purely encourages to collect facts

The articles in Wikipedia might not include them, and the contributors are the unpaid volunteers. If you claim to be experienced professor, reveal you're true identity, or prefer to use pseudo names, or make a contribution without registering your edits and arguments judged on the merits. Wikipedia allows the sources that are valid for all the potential claims and don’t permit contributors to make their personal believes points and conclusions publicize while writing articles. All the editors should come up with the neutral point of view they should only collect pertinent opinions that can be drawn to reliable sources.  

 

Wikipedia is a neutral platform and doesn’t encourage the political system

The foundation that runs Wikipedia is ruled by the board of trustees that is needed to its bylaws to have so many members selected from the Wikimedia community. The board and Wikimedia foundation staff may not often take part in the editorial issues, and the projects are self-steered and consensus-driven. Wikipedia is a transparent platform and is self-critic, any controversies are debated openly and even published in Wikipedia when they come to a standard of importance.  

 

Wikipedia has some long term objectives

Wikipedia has been created to live for a hundred years, and if it won’t, it will be transformed into something that is more potential. Hence everything about Wikipedia is crafted towards that extent such as the content, licensing, the organization steering, and general objectives as well as the fundraising scheme.

 

Wikipedia is not a promotional website

If you are waiting for Wikipedia to be acquired by any of the giant internet stop waiting for it. Wikipedia is not a promotional site run by the foundation called the Wikimedia. The organization is supported by the donations and grant the mission to give access to free knowledge to everyone. 

 

Wikipedia speaks numerous languages

Wikipedia speaks more than 300 words. Among which the most sought are the 100 language edition recently with more than 10000 articles, however, that doesn’t mean Wikipedia is not making efforts for the rest. Articles in every language are mainly initiated and developed independently of their equivalents in other words through a handful of them are direct translations.  

 

Anything can be easily modified on Wikipedia

Any information on Wikipedia can be changed, if the edits are appropriately sourced, it will remain and add to the body of knowledge. If the modifications are not sourced, and if even written by the best Wikipedia page creation service, it can be removed. As a general rule, nothing in the Wikipedia is completely deleted. Wikipedia keeps track of the changes to the content. Hence if something must be restored, it can be quickly done. 

 

The quality of your work is the responsibility of Wikipedia  

Wikipedia has a complete set of guidelines and quality control mechanism. The editors can track the changes as they happen, or come to particular topics of interest, keep track of the users’ record of contribution, flag erroneous articles for reviews and report criticism, discuss the advantages of every article with other users and a lot more. 

The articles found as the best are awarded as the featured ones the status and the erroneous pages are flagged for removal. Wikipedia focuses on the enhancement of particular topic areas. The potentially suitable articles might go in other Media or distribute in the educational institutions. 

 

Building the walls of trust with Wikipedia

It’s quite natural for the crowdsourcing platform and works in progress such as Wikipedia that quality may not remain stable from time and again and may vary from article to article. In the meantime, some article is of the more excellent quality for learning and knowledge well others are undeniable a pile of complete rubbish. Moreover, since anyone can edit Wikipedia at any time, the articles might include errors and criticism that may interpret that Wikipedia is not a reliable source.  Hence it’s highly discouraging to rely on Wikipedia for making important decisions. The encyclopedia is mainly created to enhance the understanding of certain subjects and learn the jargons related to it and learning new aspects for which you can go beyond Wikipedia. The cited links help learn more about the topic. 

 

Wikipedia purely encourages to collect facts

The articles in Wikipedia might not include them, and the contributors are the unpaid volunteers. If you claim to be experienced professor, reveal you're true identity, or prefer to use pseudo names, or make a contribution without registering your edits and arguments judged on the merits. Wikipedia allows the sources that are valid for all the potential claims and don’t permit contributors to make their personal believes points and conclusions publicize while writing articles. All the editors should come up with the neutral point of view they should only collect pertinent opinions that can be drawn to reliable sources.  

 

Wikipedia is a neutral platform and doesn’t encourage the political system

The foundation that runs Wikipedia is ruled by the board of trustees that is needed to its bylaws to have so many members selected from the Wikimedia community. The board and Wikimedia foundation staff may not often take part in the editorial issues, and the projects are self-steered and consensus-driven. Wikipedia is a transparent platform and is self-critic, any controversies are debated openly and even published in Wikipedia when they come to a standard of importance.  

 

Wikipedia has some long term objectives

Wikipedia has been created to live for a hundred years, and if it won’t, it will be transformed into something that is more potential. Hence everything about Wikipedia is crafted towards that extent such as the content, licensing, the organization steering, and general objectives as well as the fundraising scheme.

gallery/adorable-blur-bookcase-261895